Editors rightly believe that judgement of the quality and relevance of their newspaper is their preserve but, according to WAN report, they are faced with some tough decisions about reducing their editorial resources. From a negative perspective, pressures on advertising revenues could lead to reduced volumes. More positively, readers’ demands for less content, perhaps presented across different media, will encourage editors to prioritise their range of content, and determine more scientifically how that content will be channelled via print, PC or mobile and the most efficient means of achieving it.
In order to optimise their decision, editors need to be able to apply sophisticated determinants of reader satisfaction, and to demonstrate the quality, value and efficiency of their resources.
The WAN report says editorial resources can be measured at four levels:
Effectiveness - how well the newspaper is perceived by readers and how
well the newspaper caters for its defined target readership;
Efficiency - the use of resources required to produce the paper, and
whether these resources are being used more or less efficiently;
Economy - the value of the resources used and how these compare with
other, similar newspapers;
Editorial - the measures that the editor and his managers apply when
judging how well the editorial staff are doing their jobs.
To get a copy of WAN report on Editorial Measurement, please contact rap21@wan.asso.fr
